Volume 18, Issue 73 (11-2024)
etiadpajohi 2024, 18(73): 205-240 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Darvishi B, mohammadi S. Reasons for the Prolongation in Proceedings in the Board for Investigating Administrative Violations of Employees and their Impact on the Secretariat Boards of the Anti-Narcotics Headquarters. etiadpajohi 2024; 18 (73) :205-240
URL: http://etiadpajohi.ir/article-1-2171-en.html
URL: http://etiadpajohi.ir/article-1-2171-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (494 Views)
Objective: Decision-making regarding the claims made, leading to a judicial or quasi-judicial process within a reasonable timeframe, while adhering to the principles of a fair trial, is a guarantee of justice. To ensure justice by making timely decisions on claims that lead to judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings, while adhering to the principles of a fair trial. Method: This research is descriptive and analytical. To gather data, this research employed library and documentary methods, as well as interviews, to gather information. By consulting various sources, legal principles, and regulations, an attempt was made to answer the question of what factors contribute to the prolongation of proceedings in administrative disciplinary cases handled by quasi-judicial bodies. In this context, and regarding the how and why of the issue, after a conceptual explanation, a legislative history of administrative disciplinary proceedings and the current structure overseeing these proceedings, factors such as weaknesses in the clarity of the specific elements of offenses in the law on administrative offenses, ambiguities in the intensification of penalties, ambiguity in applying discounts commensurate with the job position, the legal incompatibility of offenses and penalties, the law's inadequacy in the defendant's defense rights, difficulties in determining higher and lower authorities, difficulties in the jurisdiction and hierarchical supervision of higher and lower authorities, the lack of clarity in the scope of law enforcement in terms of place and time, ambiguity in the initiation of proceedings and urgency, the insufficiency of determining legal deadlines, ambiguity in the signing of documents, the insufficiency of the criteria for using experts, weaknesses in the regulations for notification and oversight, the necessity of providing limitations on the non-interference of influential individuals, etc., in delaying proceedings in the committees have been identified. In this research, through a case study, the performance of the secretariat of the anti-narcotics headquarters was examined by studying closed and ongoing cases in the administrative disciplinary committee of this authority and obtaining opinions from relevant stakeholders. Results: The findings showed that factors such as legislative defects, human resources, weaknesses in the use of expertise in the proceedings, etc. cause prolongation. Conclusion: Based on the research findings, measures such as the need for mandatory training for members, the development of suitable rules of procedure, the training of employees, and the use of lawyers and legal advisors can minimize prolongation.
Keywords: Procedure, Prolongation, Oversight, Administrative offenses, Primary committee, Appeals Committee, Anti-narcotics headquarters
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2019/09/29 | Accepted: 2019/11/11 | Published: 2024/12/20
Received: 2019/09/29 | Accepted: 2019/11/11 | Published: 2024/12/20
References
1. ابراهیمی، فتاح (1393). اصول دادرسی عادلانه در رسیدگی به تخلفات اداری، تهران: نشر شهردانش.
2. اعلامیه¬ي جهانی حقوق بشر، 1948.
3. امورتدوین و تنقیح و انتشار قوانین و مقررات (1393). مجموعه قانون اساسي جمهوري اسلامي ايران، تهران: معاونت تدوين و تنقيح و انتشار قوانين و مقررات رياست جمهوري.
4. امور تدوین و تنقیح و انتشار قوانین و مقررات (1398). مجموعه تنقیحی قانون مبارزه با مواد مخدر و مقررات مربوط، تهران: معاونت تدوين و تنقيح و انتشار قوانين و مقررات رياست جمهوري.
5. آيين¬نامه¬ی اجرايي قانون رسيدگي به تخلفات اداري مصوب 27/07/1373 هيأت وزيران.
6. آیین¬نامه¬ی اداری ستاد مبارزه با مواد مخدر- 12/05/1370.
7. درویشی، بابک و محمدی، سعید (1398). علل اطاله¬ي دادرسی در هیأت‌رسيدگي به تخلفات اداري كارمندان، پايان¬نامه كارشناسي ارشد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد تهران مركز، دانشكده حقوق.
8. صابر، محمود (1394). آیین¬دادرسی ديوان کیفری بین¬المللی، تهران: نشر دادگستر.
9. عميدزنجاني، عباسعلي و موسي¬زاده، ابراهيم (1389). نظارت بر اعمال حكومت و عدالت اداري، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
10. قانون اجازه الحاق دولت ايران به ميثاق بين‌المللي حقوق مدني و سياسي مصوب17/2/1354.
11. قانون اساسي جمهوري اسلامي ايران.
12. قانون رسيدگي به تخلفات اداري مصوب 7/9/1372.
13. قانون مبارزه با مواد مخدر مصوب 03/08/1367 با اصلاحات و الحاقات بعدی.
14. كنوانسيون اروپايي حقوق بشر ]حمايت از حقوق بشر و آزاديهاي اساسي[ تنظيم شده در سال1950 و لازم الاجرا از 1953 با اصلاحيه¬هاي بعدي
15. محمدي، مختار (1391). مجموعه كامل قوانين و مقررات محشاي رسيدگي به تخلفات اداري، تهران: مركز آموزش مديريت دولتي رياست جمهوري.
16. مصوبات ستاد مبارزه با مواد مخدر- جلسه¬ی56(ضوابط استخدامی و نظام پرداخت و دستورالعمل مربوط)-.
17. مصوبه¬ی جلسه 828-26/07/1396 هیأت عالی نظارت رسیدگی به تخلفات اداری.
18. نظریه¬ی تفسیری شماره¬ی 4575-03/03/1372 شورای نگهبان.
19. نظریه¬ی تفسیری شماره¬ی 5318-24/07/1372 شورای نگهبان.
20. هداوند، مهدی و آقایی¬طوق، مسلم (1389). دادگاه‌های اختصاصی در پرتو اصول و آیین‌‌های دادرسی منصفانه (حقوق ایران و مطالعه تطبیقی)، تهران: نشرخرسندی.
21. سایر : اسناد و اطلاعات قابل دسترس از دبیرخانه¬ی ستاد مبارزه با مواد مخدر.
22. American Convention on Human Rights (http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties B-32American Convention on Human Rights.htm)
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
